benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU-Pro / 10927 / Which of the following fallacies is a way of suppressing evidence that…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

Which of the following fallacies is a way of suppressing evidence that eliminates a source of evidence from consideration by claiming the source is flawed, when there is no true relationship between the alleged flaw and the reliability of the source?

category

philosophy

options

  1. straw man
  2. snob appeal
  3. bandwagon fallacy
  4. appeal to anonymous authority
  5. false dilemma
  6. significance
  7. appeal to ignorance
  8. argumentum ad populum
  9. poisoning the well
  10. cherry picking

src

ori_mmlu-logical_fallacies

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import