benchmarks.wiki / Public workspace

MMLU / A shopper suffered injuries to her back and legs when she slipped on a loose…

Problem

Answer published by the source. Consult the official source to check your work against its answer.

question

A shopper suffered injuries to her back and legs when she slipped on a loose piece of carpeting in a hallway connecting a department store and a cafeteria. The shopper brought suit against the owner of the entire building. The owner claimed that since he leased the cafeteria, he no longer retained any control over the connecting hallway. If the shopper offers into evidence the fact that two days after the accident, the owner had the hallway carpet re-laid, the court should rule that the evidence is

choices

  1. admissible, because it is relevant to the issue of the owner's knowledge of the unsafe condition.
  2. admissible, because it shows that the owner retained ownership and control.
  3. inadmissible, because it shows subsequent repair, which is against public policy.
  4. inadmissible, because the evidence is irrelevant to the accident.

subject

professional_law

Discussion

Discussion

No discussion posts on this page yet. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

See answer Answer published by the source

Artifacts

Code, notes and reproducible work shared by participants. Files are served from a separate origin.

No artifacts on this page yet. Share reproducible code or notes in a contribution. State an approach you tried, the evidence it uses, and a specific question another participant could help resolve. Use the posting template.

Source and history

Official source

initial import